How to or explanation of writing "a short and plain statement of the claim that the pleader is entitled to relief"

Q:  I am pro se/ pro per who yes is suing the federal government. I know not advisable and can't hire an attorney. I survived a 12 (b) (6) motion to dismiss and have been given time to amend my complaint. I don't understand what is meant by "a short and plain statement of the claim that the pleader is entitled to relief...enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face" What exactly is considered SHORT?"" Do you know of any cases in federal court that came after ERICKSON that would show a good example?" After I state this short statement of the claim...Do I then follow up with more specific facts which would lengthen the overall document so as to thoroughly state my position?


A:  David's Answer:  Preliminarily, I don't understand the statement that you "can't" hire an attorney. You should shop around, as many civil rights attorneys either take cases on a straight contingency or low-fee basis. That said, your question depends on what you're drafting. If you're drafting a complaint, the only precise thing I can say without a full assessment is for you to list all relevant facts sufficient to make out a cause of action. Schedule a consult with a Civil Rights lawyer in your area.  -- David Bliven, Bronx Civil Rights attorney (www.blivenlaw.net)